Christians and “American Rage”

Anger 2

Grassroots politics in our country just keeps getting angrier. The anger has simmered for years, fueled by opportunistic politicians and talk-radio commentators. In this election season presidential candidates across the spectrum are fanning the flames. Unfortunately, they appear more interested in transforming the anger into votes than in finding lasting solutions to the issues generating the anger. “American Rage”, an Esquire Magazine/NBC News joint survey, asked a diverse group of 3000 Americans their views regarding a wide range of current issues. I encourage you to read this study in detail, to consider its implications for our life together, and of course to raise questions where warranted.

“American Rage” identifies three main factors shaping our collective anger:

  • Experience of unfair treatment–70% of blacks, 48% of women, and even 21% of white men expressed anger about the way they are treated in this country.
  • Empathy measures our concern about how others are treated. Blacks and Hispanics surveyed reported the most anger about how various other minorities are treated, while Whites reported the least anger about the treatment of other groups.
  • Expectations refers to disappointment and frustration with regard to one’s current situation and future prospects: “Are you disappointed? Do you feel stifled and shortchanged and sold a bill of goods? Then you’re probably pretty angry. Consider the white men and women in our survey: From their views on the state of the American dream (dead) and America’s role in the world (not what it used to be) to how their life is working out for them (not quite what they’d had in mind), a plurality of whites tends to view life through a veil of disappointment… we see the anger of perceived disenfranchisement—a sense that the majority has become a persecuted minority, the bitterness of a promise that didn’t pan out…”

 How do Christians relate to this collective anger? Some of us ignore it and hope it goes away. After all, politics isn’t very “spiritual”. And didn’t Jesus say anger was pretty close to murder? “You’re familiar with the command of the ancients, ‘Do not murder.’ I’m telling you that anyone who is so much as angry with a brother or sister is guilty of murder.” (Matthew 5:21-22 MSG) So let’s not even go there. We’ll suppress it, repress it, deny it, ignore the anger of “those people”. anger 3

Some of us plunge into the fray and choose up sides that fit our theological and/or political views. Decades of experience have taught me that church people can fight as dirty as anybody—even politicians! Still, we may feel some guilt about mixing it up with folks. We have a dim memory of that Bible verse: “Be angry or do not sin.” Then somebody reads us the real thing: “Be angry and do not sin.” (Ephesians 4 :26 NKJV) Now we’re confused! Aren’t “anger” and “do not sin” mutually exclusive? How—in God’s name–can we hold them together?

Another translation says (and continues), “Go ahead and be angry. You do well to be angry—but don’t use your anger as fuel for revenge. And don’t stay angry. Don’t go to bed angry. Don’t give the Devil that kind of foothold in your life.” (Ephesians 4:26-27 MSG) Anger and other feelings are neither good nor bad in themselves. We may express feelings lovingly or unlovingly, healingly or hurtfully, etc. It’s not the anger. It’s the poisonous hate festering deep inside; our careful nurturing of resentment; our targeted hate that identifies the person with whom we’re angry with the issue that divides us. “Be angry and do not sin.” Address the issue—promptly, clearly, lovingly (well under 100 decibels!). Speak your piece and be sure your neighbor knows you will listen to him/her/them as intensely as you have spoken. Be angry over the issue and be equally clear that the other is, like you, a beloved child of God—no matter how maddening their recent words or deeds!

anger 1

Anger without sin

  • Does not dehumanize, demonize, disrespect, diminish, label, or stereotype the other. It recognizes each person’s full humanity and treats him/her/them as we would expect to be treated if the situation were reversed.
  • Is not all about me. It seeks God’s will, not my self-justification. It seeks the best outcome for all.
  • Isn’t a winner-take-all fight-to-the-death. Its goal is collaboration, constructive action, community-building, and reconciliation.
  • Willingly listens to differing perspectives. It knows that mutual understanding and respect are the foundation for consensus or at least agreeing to disagree agreeably.

We who follow Jesus can offer a unique witness in our angry, polarized society. Father Richard Rohr’s writings express the shape of this witness. His Center for Action and Contemplation in Albuquerque, New Mexico organizes its life around Eight Core Principles. Two of them especially fit this discussion. No. 1–“The teaching of Jesus is our central reference point.” Yes, anger is close to murder. Our murderous heart wants to obliterate that other person, we just haven’t acted on it. “The teachings of Jesus” also include “Love your neighbor as yourself”, “Love your enemy…”, and others that make it hard to stay (self-)righteously polarized.

Core Principle No. 3 states, “The best criticism of the bad is the practice of the better. Oppositional energy only creates more of the same.” In fact, the more “oppositional energy” we generate, the more we lose sight of the most vulnerable people in our society. This principle challenges us to follow another way. Instead of playing down to the opposition’s level, let’s raise our game and challenge others to live and relate at that higher level.

In the first century Paul called Christians in Rome to “the practice of the better”: “If you’ve got it in you, get along with everybody. Don’t insist on getting even; that’s not for you to do… Our Scriptures tell us that if you see your enemy hungry, go buy that person lunch, or if he’s thirsty, get him a drink. Your generosity will surprise him with goodness. Don’t let evil get the best of you; get the best of evil by doing good.” (Romans 12:18-21 MSG)

“Be angry and do not sin.” What does that look like in your family; your workplace; your neighborhood; your church? How will you pursue “the practice of the better” where you live your life?

6 Responses to “Christians and “American Rage””


  1. 1 Jessica Boucher January 5, 2016 at 7:29 PM

    Great post – we need to get out act together lol! Shared on Facebook – hope that’s ok!

    Sent from my iPhone

    >

  2. 3 bthomas January 6, 2016 at 8:29 AM

    There is a time to turn the other cheek, etc. That time is past. So the disciples of Saul Alensky want us to all just get along and be good little democrats? Nope. Not interested. They have well demonstrated that playing on various demographics to create division is a viable political weapon. So, … now they get a dose of their own medicine. They are the ones who laud the idea of never letting a good crisis go to waste. Turn about is fair play.

    • 4 soulmanlv January 7, 2016 at 3:54 PM

      Re “turn the other cheek, etc.”–Contrary to conventional wisdom, this bit of JEsus’ advice did not advocate passive acceptance of oppressive treatment. Recent biblical scholarship illustrates how “Turn the other cheek,” as well as Jesus’ advice to go an extra mile and to give someone your cloak when they try to take your coat (Matthew 5:38-41) were actually acts of assertive nonviolent resistance.Go to http://www.dharmagates.org/other_cheek.html“> to learn about Walter Wink’s understanding of this passage. Not sure about your reference to Saul Alinsky. He didn’t advocate violence, but neither did he advocate that folks being treated unjustly just lay down and take it. People of faith need to speak up, but we need to focus on issues and solutions rather than on personally attacking those with whom we disagree. After all, “the best criticism of the bad is practice of the better”.

      • 5 bthomas January 7, 2016 at 9:04 PM

        If the democrats want to act according to Scripture, fine. All for it. But, that is not the case. It’s no unlike the Romans attacking the Jews on the Sabbath. The Jews decided they would not allow the Romans to use selected tenets of their faith to disadvantage and defeat them. This is the same thing. The current modus operandi of the democrats is to follow Alinsky’s rules for radicals. Fine. Give it right back to them.

      • 6 soulmanlv January 9, 2016 at 11:52 AM

        I’m not talking partisanship. What I’ve said about, respect, refraining from personal attacks, etc., applies to everyone involved in the dialog. I’d expect Republicans, Libertarians, and others who claim to be Christian to follow Jesus’ teachings ahead of political ideology. And I still don’t understand how Saul AL in sky got dragged into this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Categories


%d bloggers like this: